The refinq 100
Europe’s 100 most
climate-exposed regions.
Scoring regions for climate exposure is what we do every day. So when the European Commission announced it will name 100 vulnerable territories this October, we ran the same question across every region in the EU, all 1,165 of them.
Findings
What the data says
Where it hits hardest
Photo © European Union, 2026
Method
How the ranking is built
Unit
Europe’s standard statistical regions (NUTS-3), roughly a province or a district. 2024 definition, from Eurostat.
Hazards and data
Heat, water scarcity, wildfire, flood. Sources: Copernicus C3S, WRI Aqueduct 4.0, JRC.
Scenario, horizon
High emissions, no further climate policy (RCP8.5 / SSP5-8.5). Year 2080, compared against 2006 to 2025.
Scale
0 to 100 combined, higher means more exposed.
Aggregation
We score what is actually built in a region, site by site, then add it up to the region.
Combined score
The plain average of the four hazards. None counts for more than another.
Region boundaries come from Eurostat’s GISCO service (NUTS 2024) © EuroGeographics. The satellite imagery on the map is by Esri, Maxar and Earthstar Geographics. All scores are refinq’s own.
Exposure is not vulnerability.
This ranking measures how hard climate hazards hit what is built in a region. It does not measure how well that region is prepared for them. A region can rank high here and still be in good shape, because it has defences, money and a plan. The European Commission is assessing vulnerability, which adds exactly those things in. The two views belong together, and the interesting places are the ones where they disagree.
Interactive map
Find your region
All 1,165 regions of the EU, every hazard, and a slider that runs from today to 2080. Look up your own and see where it lands.
Region-level is where we start, not where we stop.
The refinq platform scores individual assets, perils, exposure and the protection gap, site by site.


